refactor(stack): make functions configuration explicit - #6089
Open
jgoux wants to merge 127 commits into
Open
Conversation
…ack-factory-resource-locality
…-model # Conflicts: # packages/stack/README.md # packages/stack/docs/architecture.md
…ementation # Conflicts: # packages/process-compose/src/Orchestrator.ts # packages/process-compose/src/Orchestrator.unit.test.ts # packages/stack/src/Stack.unit.test.ts
…ctory-resource-locality # Conflicts: # packages/process-compose/src/Orchestrator.ts
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload # Conflicts: # pnpm-lock.yaml
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload
…-model # Conflicts: # packages/stack/src/versions.ts
…ctory-resource-locality
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload
…/process-compose-supervisor-cleanup
…/stack-runtime-implementation # Conflicts: # packages/process-compose/src/Orchestrator.ts # packages/process-compose/src/Orchestrator.unit.test.ts
…ctory-resource-locality # Conflicts: # packages/process-compose/docs/architecture.md # packages/process-compose/src/Orchestrator.ts # packages/stack/src/LocalStack.ts
…ality' into agent/functions-bundle-runtime-reload # Conflicts: # packages/stack/src/LocalStack.ts
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e302ffe84e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…/process-compose-supervisor-cleanup
…ack-runtime-implementation # Conflicts: # packages/stack/src/StackBuilder.ts # packages/stack/src/StackBuilder.unit.test.ts
…ctory-resource-locality # Conflicts: # packages/stack/src/StackBuilder.ts
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload
…/process-compose-supervisor-cleanup
…ack-runtime-implementation
…ctory-resource-locality
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload
…ions-bundle-runtime-reload
![depthfirst-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1021002?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Coly010
approved these changes
Aug 6, 2026
…-model # Conflicts: # packages/stack/src/ServiceActivation.ts # packages/stack/src/StackBuilder.ts # packages/stack/src/StackLifecycleCoordinator.ts
…gent/process-compose-supervisor-cleanup # Conflicts: # packages/process-compose/docs/architecture.md # packages/process-compose/src/Orchestrator.ts # packages/process-compose/src/ServiceTransition.ts # packages/stack/src/ServiceActivation.ts # packages/stack/src/StackBuilder.ts # packages/stack/src/StackLifecycleCoordinator.ts
…-cleanup' into agent/stack-runtime-implementation # Conflicts: # packages/stack/src/ServiceActivation.ts # packages/stack/src/StackLifecycleCoordinator.ts
…on' into agent/stack-factory-resource-locality
…ality' into agent/functions-bundle-runtime-reload
jgoux
changed the base branch from
agent/stack-factory-resource-locality
to
develop
August 6, 2026 14:31
jgoux
enabled auto-merge
August 6, 2026 14:31
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4727261158
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
This makes the stack boundary independent of CLI project conventions and gives direct callers an explicit input model. In detached mode, resolved environment values travel only in the Unix-socket request body and are persisted only in the owner-only ephemeral runtime file.
Depends on #6086 and its prerequisite stack architecture chain.