fix(e2e): Do not print secret value from secret.Fixture.HaveNonEmptyKeyValue - #1258
fix(e2e): Do not print secret value from secret.Fixture.HaveNonEmptyKeyValue#1258olivergondza wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…eyValue It confuses openshift-ci secrets redaction Signed-off-by: Oliver Gondža <ogondza@gmail.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔗 Linked repositories identifiedCodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe secret matcher no longer logs secret contents. It computes the empty-value status once, logs that status, and returns the inverse. ChangesSecret matcher behavior
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The change prevents secret values from being printed during end-to-end tests, reducing the chance of exposing sensitive output; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Comment |
It confuses openshift-ci secrets redaction
This was triggered by "verifies that the Dex client secret is sourced from a short-lived TokenRequest token and is correctly set in argocd-secret" printing JWT.
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What does this PR do / why we need it:
Have you updated the necessary documentation?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #?
Test acceptance criteria:
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer: