docs: clarify cache calculation challenge wording - #8588
Open
slegarraga wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Legarraga <64795732+slegarraga@users.noreply.github.com>
Size changesDetails📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for react-devThis analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖 This PR introduced no changes to the JavaScript bundle! 🙌 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #8099
Clarifies the challenge and both solutions so they don't imply the original Effect version called
getVisibleTodos()on every keystroke. The text now makes explicit that the goal is to preserve the existing caching behavior while removing the Effect and the extra state round-trip.Verified with prettier.