Skip to content

Improve GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq - #8982

Open
anthonydahanne wants to merge 1 commit into
github:anthonydahanne/advisory-improvement-8982from
anthonydahanne:anthonydahanne-GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq
Open

Improve GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq#8982
anthonydahanne wants to merge 1 commit into
github:anthonydahanne/advisory-improvement-8982from
anthonydahanne:anthonydahanne-GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq

Conversation

@anthonydahanne

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • References

Comments

Hello reviewers!
Requesting that the CVE ID for this advisory be set to GHSA-6qm2-mcq7-53qp, assigned by HeroDevs (CNA, org 36c7be3b-2937-45df-85ea-ca7133ea542c) and published 2026-08-04. The CVE record cites this GHSA in its source.advisory field.

The advisory currently shows "No known CVE" and the OSV export in github/advisory-database has "aliases": [], so downstream consumers treat the GHSA and the CVE as two separate vulnerabilities. Setting the CVE ID would populate aliases and deduplicate them.

I have added the CVE record URL to the references, but the CVE ID field itself is not editable through this form

Thank you!

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 4, 2026 22:12
@github-actions
github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to anthonydahanne/advisory-improvement-8982 August 4, 2026 22:14
Signed-off-by: Anthony Dahanne <anthony.dahanne@gmail.com>
@anthonydahanne
anthonydahanne force-pushed the anthonydahanne-GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq branch from 644b1a7 to 7607325 Compare August 4, 2026 22:15

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Associates the reviewed advisory with CVE-2026-18401 so downstream consumers can deduplicate records.

Changes:

  • Adds the CVE alias and official CVE reference.
  • Updates the advisory modification timestamp.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants